Archive for May, 2012|Monthly archive page


And I’m no retail CEO, but it strikes me that selling a device which is locked into someone else’s virtual retail space is akin to signing your own death warrant. I’m sure there’s a reason that Waterstone’s has done this deal, but at first blush, I don’t get it. From Richard Lea in The Guardian:

Monday morning and already it’s the end of the world. Instead ofteaming up with Barnes and Noble to cast out the “ruthless money-making devil” Amazon, a tired-looking James Daunt has pulled up a chair and supped with him, striking a deal to “launch new e-reading services and offer Kindle digital devices through its UK shops”. Is that what he meant when he talked about being “different from Amazon … [and] better“?


In a broader opinion piece surveying the changing landscape of business and innovation fromThomas Friedman in the New York Times, there was this snippet:

This is leading to an explosion of new firms and voices. “Sixteen of the top 100 best sellers on Kindle today were self-published,” said Bezos. That means no agent, no publisher, no paper — just an author, who gets most of the royalties, and Amazon and the reader.

The (next) Library of Utopia

Nicholas Carr on Harvard’s latest attempt at a universal online library in Technology Review:

It sounds straightforward. And if it were just a matter of moving bits and bytes around, a universal online library might already exist. Google, after all, has been working on the challenge for 10 years. But the search giant’s book program has foundered; it is mired in a legal swamp. Now another momentous project to build a universal library is taking shape. It springs not from Silicon Valley but from Harvard University. The Digital Public Library of America—the DPLA—has big goals, big names, and big contributors.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.